TAPED
TO THE DOOR OF MATTHEW ASHFORD'S
(JACK DEVERAUX, Days of Our Lives)
dressing room is a card depicting the Marx Brothers — Harpo,
Grouch and Chico — each hanging by his collar from a coat
rack. "Did you see this?" asks Ashford, flashing a smile.
"Michael Sabatino (Lawrence) gave
it to me. He and I have the same sense of humor."
The
card, of course, is meant to symbolize the fate of Ashford, Sabatino
and Crystal Chappell (Carly), all of
whom are being written off the show— hung out to dry, so to
speak — in a manner of months. "We all just say, `Well,
this is part of the [business], and at least we're in good company,'"
Ashford says matter-of-factly.
Ashford, a six-year Days veteran, whose
contract expires Sept. 26, had all intentions of signing on again.
"Negotiations were going along, as far as I knew, very well,"
he says. "There was definitely no question of money. It was
not a problem at all, which is interesting after the last time,
when we just couldn't get over that hurdle.
"What I was going through was a series of meetings with [executive
producer] Ken Corday, [co-executive producer] Tom Langan, and other
people at NBC." he continues. "I was talking to them about
my creative concerns. My feeling was if they wanted me to commit
to two more years — they even wanted three years at one point
— they needed to commit to two years of good story."
Ashford diplomatically describes his last two years on the show
as "less than glorious. I think everyone is aware of that.
Nothing was fully thought out, a lot of damage was done to characters."
He believes Jack, in particular, went through an endless cycle of
"buffooning."
While Ashford admits he's always fought for the opportunity to go
for the laugh, he concedes that it snowballed. "I never wanted
to be comical; I wanted to be humorous. . . someone who'd be able
to laugh and then cry. My aim was to try to show the humor in life,
but not make it too big. But things stated to get out of hand. I
fell into a niche." Ironically, the actor says he has seen
progress in recent months, noting that Jack has been moving in the
direction of becoming "a more solid and effective character."
Ashford also believes the show's current writing regime is "not
just give over to blatant jokes and stuff like that. If there's
humor in something, they allow Missy (Reeves,
who plays Jack's wife, Jennifer) and me to find it. I think
Jim Reilly is capable, competent writer," says Ashford. "if
he is left alone by other people around him, he can tell a good
story."
Story being Ashford's prime concern, he felt compelled to question
the Days brass about Jack's future. Those
inquiries were never answered, he says. Instead, the show halted
negotiations. "They just withdrew," says Ashford. "Obviously
something happened up in the offices. I can't really speak for what
their ultimate reasons were. I think it has to do with what they
want to see on the show now, and I think they don't want to see
me. My understanding is that they going to recast the role.
"Last
year, 21 contract players were taken off the show. The year before
that, it was a similar number," he explains. "As much
as The Young and the Restless holds on
to its people and builds an audience that way, Days
continually gets rid of people when something goes wrong. That's
the way they run things."
Did he ever anticipate becoming one of those causalities? Maybe
in sense I did. Underneath, as an actor, my challenge has always
been to grow. Sometimes I take that are written one way and challenge
myself to find more levels to them. It's not easy, but I take what
I can bring to a scene very seriously. That's the kind of work I
want to do. I have a feeling that the producers and i don't always
see [things] the same. Sometimes new challenges aren't what they
have in mind. I think we were getting to a point where the cage
was getting a little too small."
Ashford also believes that in an attempt to shake up the show and
boost sagging ratings, Days execs have
been moving the show in an entirely different direction for some
time. "When a new production team comes in, they have their
people that they want to focus on," he explains. "That's
part of this business. I feel like the production team as it is
has wanted people to forget about Jack and Jennifer and try to focus
more on other characters. . . like Austin and Carrie. it's literally
the old world order and the new world order kind of thinking. Jack
and Jennifer are part of the old world.
"The goal of the present producers is to push Kate, Lucas,
Billie and Austin. They are, in a sense, the new Horton family,"
says Ashford, referring to Days' blossoming
new core. "Even though not all their names will be Horton,
they'll be part of that circle. I think Days
is taking a chance. I think they're betting on the future. They're
bringing on new actors with new faces, and I don't think they're
that concerned about viewer acceptance," he adds."Unfortunately,
there's a feeling that if people watch the show, they'll keep watching.
It's a bi jaded a bit cynical, but I think that's what their bet
is."
Why Ashford, one of the most popular and youngest old faces on the
show, doesn't fit into Days' remains a
question, and one he can only speculate about. "I remember
a lot of things the producers don't exactly want to remember, think
about or deal with." he notes, adding that a recast with no
real knowledge of Jack's past "definitely makes it easier.
He'll probably do things based on what started the day before.
"It's funny. Memory is selective thing," Ashford says.
"You can remember what you want. The history being remember
about Bill, Laura, this person and that, suits [upcoming[ story.
But other things they want to forget."
Ashford cites a scene in which Deborah Adair's Kate was supposed
to hold up Harper Deveraux, Jack's late father, as someone for Jack
to emulate. "Deborah had no idea that the man was an ax murderer
who had hacked up three or for women," Ashford explains. "To
let her talk about him in an admiring, wonderful way would have
been unfair to her as an actress. Then, the audience watches and
says, `Bogus!' So I mentioned it to her, and she was able to make
an adjustment [in her dialogue].
"The whole rape story is something they couldn't deal with,"
he continues, referring to Jack's violation of Kayla Johnson. "But
for better or for worse, those were the stories of
Days. My hope was that we could have developed from
them rather than away from them and not act like they didn't happen."
Despite the size of his role, Ashford has never really fit
Days' brand of macho, heroic leading men. "I've
always been odd man out, but I like to play that — neither
good nor bad but somewhere in between," he insists. "Jack's
kind of a common man with common problems. How can someone be totally
clean and never be considered a villain? How can someone hardly
ever take off his clothes, never hang all over someone, have deep
quenching kisses, and still be considered [part of the best] couple
in daytime?" he says, referring to the Soap Opera
Digest Award he and Reeves won on
more than one occasion. "To me those things are very interesting."
He notes that the year he took flak for being the lousiest kisser
in daytime, he and Reeves won awards for best wedding and most romantic
love story."
He doesn't give credence to the rumors that he and Reeves lack chemistry,
and that's part of the reason he's being let go. "To me chemistry
is not just to people licking each other and throwing off their
clothes. Sometimes that becomes a crutch." he declares. "I
feel sorry for Drake (Hogestyn, who plays John)
sometimes; they'll just write in he has his shirt off — in
the middle of a snowstorm."
Ashford believes real chemistry isn't necessarily hot, sweaty and
animalistic. "Sometimes you have to dig deeper, find a deeper
connection. Missy and I try to be as honest, simple, and sincere
with one another as possible. I feel we have a communication and
a trust that is our own, and that is the most important thing.
"We have definitely been in an unfortunate story pit,"
he admits"We've constantly asked for things that we could challenge
together, and we've constantly been pushed aside. Newly married
couples have all sorts of interesting, funny, romantic problems.
Things could have been written on and on, but nothing was ever delved
into in a serious, real way."
Despite the recent lack of storyline attention, Ashford has found
memories of his tenure on Days, "in
terms of everything I've been able to do, express and explore. I
feel I've grow a lot as an actor, and become more confident in the
process. Jack has been a very interesting phenomenon from the writers
to the press to the public," he says "Many people connect
with the character. They'd tell me he was just like their boyfriend,
husband or brother. Yet, I'd still be pointed out or ridiculed for
some of the things I tried to do just on a person-to-person level.
But I was always into taking chances, doing the thing that was not
expected, making the difficult choice and not the easy one. And
by that I mean making the choice that is not cosmetic, the choice
that doesn't show the character in a bright, rosy light. I got flak
about that in various places and that's OK, because I wanted to
provoke thought. I wanted people to consider things — that
sometimes a villain is not a villain, sometimes a good person is
not a good person. There are different sides to everything.
"The opportunity to play this role has been tremendous. I may
not have gotten it on other shows. I've really appreciated —
Ken Corday to former producers Al Rabin and Shelley Curtis, even
down to Tom Langan — the latitude give to me, whether they
wanted to give it or not. It's been a learning experience, a chance
for me to push and grow, try things and make mistakes. You can't
do that everywhere."
As he prepares to leave Days September,
Ashford says he'll long remember the show's crew. "Within the
acting quarters there's a nice camaraderie," he says. "The
crew has always been so supportive. They laugh. They keep things
up and moving and give honest responses."He'll also miss the
devotion of the Days fans. "They've
been everything from the very beginning," he notes. "They've
seen me through changes, and their response — everything from
letters of support to letters of criticism — has been incredible.
It's something I don't expect to experience again on any other show.
I want to express my appreciation to them."
Most of all, Ashford will miss collaborating with Reeves, who he
terms"a hard worker who deserves the best." He cites concern
for her future in Salem as the sole reason he wishes Jack were not
going to be recast. "I really feel it's a great opportunity
for Missy and the character of Jennifer to be cleared." he
explains. "We got stuck being together in the way they write
for married characters." Ashford even offers his blessing to
Jennifer/Austin pairing. "That seems to be a strong possibility,
in which case that's fine. My feeling, personally, is that would
be better for Missy. It would give Jennifer a chance to start over.
If that's the way it works, out Patrick Muldoon (Austin)
couldn't ask for a better partner to work with."
As far as what lies ahead for him, Ashford assures his fans that
he and his family — wife Christina Saffran, who's currently
starring in a production of My Fair Lady,
and their daughter, Grace — will be fine. "When we got
married, we were both out of work," he recalls. "I'd been
off Search for Tomorrow (Ashford
played Cagney McClary) for some time, and we were saying,
`Well, do we have enough money to get married?' Yet, underneath
I felt this confidence. I wasn't going to worry about it. I knew
we would be all right."
"Now I feel like we're kind of back to that time," he
says. "We're going to enjoy this moment, get the most gusto out
of it. It's times like this when you feel things more and think
more. It's not a time to shut off, but to open up and be more receptive
to everything. I feel we're experiencing more; that's exciting."
The actor has already started auditioning for night-time series
and movies-of-the week. He is also interested in getting involved
with a theater group recommended by Marilyn McIntyre (Jo).
"It's a group of actors who do new, serious plays. They've
TV and movies. They're interested in doing good theater. That's
what I want to do, get involved in things where i can really dig
down and work." As for the possibility of doing another soap,
"I'm not going out looking for it. If something comes my way.
. . it depends on the situation."
Ashford hopes his exodus "doesn't send a message out that (his
Days co-stars) not ask questions or be
challenging or be able to talk to [the show's producers]. If that
is what comes out of this. . . if the producers feel they can control
actors better by staying behind closed doors and actors are afraid
to go to them, then I'll feel very sad, because a wonderful opportunity
to create together will be lost. A free flow of ideas is what can
really create very interesting, lively show. It's my hope that communication
between actor and producer doesn't totally close down. I've been
on shows like that before, and there's not a lot of vision. . .
they're not very far-reaching. I hope actors can always have choices,
make decisions, create things and go with them — not just
totally take what is given to them."
If Matthew Ashford had done that, Jack Deveraux might have been
just another soap clone instead of an unforgettable enigma.
by
Janet Di Lauro
| photos
photos photos photos
photos photos photos photos
|

Ashford
and Melissa Reeves, his Days co-star
|

Ashford
and wife, actress Christina Saffran |

Ashford,
Mary Beth Evans and Stephen Nichols
(ex-Kayla
and Patch Johnson)
during their triangle.
|
Matt
letters to the editor regarding Matt's firing
|
| |
|
|
|